Toward a New Barbarism, Part V

 

Ruminating on QAnon:

I’ve found the question of QAnon fascinating. Q for future reference was of course a poster on an ostensibly anonymous image board (really, two image boards) who posted under the moniker Q with a unique alphanumeric ‘trip code.’ We will assume for the sake of conversation that this is one person for a moment and we can use the pronoun ‘he.’ Anyway, he would post generally vague information with links to Wikileaks dumps, government or think tank (like RAND) white papers, and photos.

The posts were structured in such a way as to create an ARG – alternate reality game. These had become popular since about 2004 or 2005 with the explosion of cellphones and increasing with the penetration of cell phones and GPS into daily life. One could encode information onto a GPS map, or GPS coordinates into text or images or what have you and lead people on a real life goose chase or Easter egg hunt. The whole purpose was to encode clues in such a way as to require a path through multiple media (books, films, photos, etc) at the end of which was revealed some prize. Most of these ARGs were elaborate marketing schemes for movies, video games, or TV shows, and were held in major megalopolises like Seattle, LA, or New York.

I’m not sure how many people have been involved in ARGs over the past 15 years, or what went into the development thereof, but I’ve become increasingly suspicious and paranoid of the motives of all of these types of things. I suspect that the mass man, which is to say anyone not in the managerial or ruling class (and probably, frankly even some of the more replaceable elements of the managerial class), has been studied like a lab rat the past 70 or 80 years with the purpose of being able to predict and drive behavior toward certain outcomes. The ARG would fit in neatly with that. I thus suspect that at least some of the ARGs were developed and tested with this end in mind – to see if one could get random anonymous people in large cities to follow dubious instructions in what amounted to generally marketing shill campaigns. All the better if it involves grabbing a piece of paper in a tube tied under a urinal only used scantily by the homeless, climbing into a sketchy abandoned building or water diversion infrastructure for the next clue. The more absurd the ask, the better because it is testing what will people do for an uncertain reward.

Some of the ARGs which were marketing campaigns gave cash prizes, some only gave recognition and token prizes (T-shirts, mugs, other memorabilia) to the winners. Pokemon-Go was one of the latest iterations of the ARG. Pokemon are generally randomly dispersed, but some are intentionally placed. Perhaps the rarest pokemon will be placed in dangerous black neighborhoods or on active volcanoes. Will people still go after them? The obvious answer in some cases is ‘yes.’ Some people will walk straight into the jaws of danger in a very stupid way, for a digital pet which has no real material or metaphysical upshot for them outside of a small dopamine hit.

The question we should ask about this is why would ‘they’ – ‘they’ being the plutocrats, oligarchs, central planners, whatever you want to call the few hundred thousand people who run the world of affairs for several billion – why would ‘they’ want to get people playing ARGs at all? One answer is it is a way to waste time. It is a pure diversion away from anything that could matter, say their material needs or discomfort or political crises, to something that is purely frivolous. One answer is as an experiment – see who the most gullible or easily amused elements are, and try to sate them in any way one can. Another answer, and this is more speculative than the last two, is that it is a way of getting people to accept what is going to be the future for most working class elements. Most jobs in the future will be gig or contract jobs, where you will receive work from an app on a mobile phone or some other communication device worn on the body. You will do the work per shady instructions on the app without necessarily knowing why or what for or the destination. For instance, one might be delivering mysterious packages one day and one might be delivering messages the next – or one might be enlisted in physical labor or other work of some sort if one has the requisite skill. But the app will tell an electrician for instance simply to run conduit and connect it to a junction box without necessarily spelling out the reason for it (this is a potentially innocuous example – one can think of more sinister things).

That would fit in with the Great Reset quite nicely, and if that is the case then this means that Klaus Schwab & Co. have been involved with the central planners laying the groundwork for this Great Reset for longer than most people understand.

Back to Q – there is more to it than an ARG. That is a big aspect of it, and we see that wide swathes of people can get sucked into a well-put together ARG. I don’t actually think that Q as an operation was all that well-put together, all things considered. Many of the marketing ARGs had higher budgets and better production value. Just the same, this was a psyop done by professionals. Amateurs doing amateur research, some of whom were grifters, bandwagon hangers-on, and some of whom were true believers, are going to pale in comparison to a group of intelligence agents whose jobs involve knowing obscured or classified information and deceiving and manipulating the public.

The reason it worked at convincing so many people was not merely the ARG element in which people became invested because they had to put in a little bit of work to tease out some retarded riddle. That helped, but if that was the only aspect it would have died out quickly. Another key ingredient is that of the modified limited hangout. That is, damaging information is exposed, but elements of the story are changed and the extent of the damage is concealed. For example: Q would highlight ‘Pizzagate’ and the Epstein kompromat ring, but draw his followers into retarded conclusions mostly involving the Democrat Party and celebrities. The intention was to deflect the damage away from the reality, which is that “Pizzagate” to include James Alefantis and the Podestas and alleged abuse of children is not necessarily confirmed but there is enough sign there to warrant suspicion (and investigation in an honest country, which we do not have).

The further reality is with the Epstein kompromat ring, this was not a partisan effort. Jeffrey Epstein took politicians and officials from both parties aboard his plane to his island or to his various properties (he also had properties in NY, NM, Paris, and London, and we do not have the flight manifests or entry/exit logs for any routes except for the Palm Beach to Little St James route!). Epstein was himself not the top dog but basically a middle manager working for Mossad and the CIA/FBI under Ghislaine Maxwell, Les Wexner, and Ehud Barak and the MEGA Group more broadly. The reality of the Epstein situation is that is not merely a pedophilia ring involving famous people fucking girls anywhere from age five to 15 or 16, and that these girls were from many countries and many seem to have disappeared (probably murdered by goons employed by Wexner), but that this is part of a political blackmail scheme set up by the American Crime Syndicate and namely the ‘Kosher Nostra’ Jewish part of that syndicate and not the Wops.

Epstein is one incident of about five or six which are known by True Detective-tier researchers which shows the decadence and decay of the Western power and money elite. These people fuck and murder children and get away with it. In no small part, they get away with it because of the short attention span of the public and because of people who fall for fucking gay ops like QAnon which tells them Epstein was really only ensnaring Bill Clinton and Tom Hanks. People should not worship celebrities anyway and many of these celebrities are pieces of shit who may be implicated in one child fucking ring or another, and regardless the upper echelons of Hollywood are a largely closed club which is not open to any old talented individual. I’ve spoken before on the lie of meritocracy and it is as true in Hollywood as it is in just about any part of America. The point though should not be to level accusations without good reason. I believe that actors are generally of a low sort and should be trusted, honored, and on the whole paid less than trade workers or professionals. But we live in a “society” mediated by mass media, marketing, and PR where the image is more important than reality.

There were other elements of the modified limited hangout where certain facts or events would be twisted to a partisan use to smear Democrats or “RINOs.” The distinction of “RINO” is unwarranted and doesn’t make any sense because Republicans are born losers. The whole purpose of Republicans in the post-war bipartisan consensus is to be graceful losers. They are supposed to “represent” with all due scare quotes a section of society that is being phased out of existence. They are supposed to do this “representation” while doing nothing materially for those people who are phased out. There is no difference between the edgy Republican and the “RINO” except rhetorically and bills that are drafted to expire during minority sessions or any other instance where Republicans cannot or will not pass a given bill.

At this point, I will drop the pretense of Q being a single person. I think Q was a team effort, likely spearheaded by one Ezra Cohen Watnick and other DOD or DIA people tied to the Trump admin. These people were clearly trying to influence ostensible conservatives to invest more faith in Trump and ‘white hats’ which was their name for some alleged ‘good conservative’ element of government (particularly in military and intelligence), and to trust in a plan elements of which were occasionally strutted out. The elements of that plan usually consisted of supposed mass arrests, “sealed indictments”, and coded phrases which were supposed to indicate some moment where the Occulted Imam –err, white hats – were supposed to step forward and like Jesus during the pre-tribulation rapture deliver his followers from suffering.

The other aspect of the Q psyop is dipping into the well of dispensationalism. As hinted immediately above, “the plan” in which Q followers were supposed to trust was supposed to be some event the likes of which are lifted straight out of evangelical Christian accounts of a pre-tribulation rapture. The dispensationalist account is basically something between heresy and blasphemy anyway, as there is nothing in Revelation which indicates that reading in any way. Dual covenant theology likewise. Nonetheless, dispensationalism and dual covenant theology have both grown precipitously in the past 150 years. This inspires a hopeful view, that no matter what “the good guys win in the end” and also a passive view. He who believes in the dispensationalist account, or in the Occulted Imam*, can sit back to some degree and wait for the end with little or no consequence. Passivity won’t hurt you because all is set right no matter what. I can see only two reasons for these views to proliferate – as copes for powerless people, or for one group to make another more passive by tapping into their hope and naïveté.

* This is a belief among some Twelver Shi’a, a variation on a theme of which Jason Jorjani subscribes to with his Occulted Fascist Elite thesis, which is absurd nonsense. Basically the view is that the true heir to Mohammed was already born and is in waiting somewhere to establish the great Islamic state. This is otherwise known as the Mahdi.

Q-Boomers are perhaps the most visible and obvious followers, but they’re not the only ones. Boomers are of course used to being hopeful and believing that reality should follow a rough movie or novel plot arc. It rarely follows one so well, but the boomer holds some hope in the back of their shriveled brain that one day the conclusion of the plot arc of the past 70 years will be revealed, the hero will step forth, and the tragedy will be turned into a heroic triumph. There are younger people who share this rough frame of mind. Many of them feel that without something to pin their hopes (or copes) on, there is no reason to keep living. This is a fundamentally weak and despondent frame of mind where some great daddy figure must save them while they meekly wage slave and follow orders. It is the plight of the house nigger, hoping that one day Nat Turner’s gang will come around and free them but unwilling to lift a finger in the pursuit of their freedom. Increasingly the younger generations of white Americans are becoming field niggers and whatever the caste of nigger was that was given to sexual slavery and total ritual humiliation and debasement. (Did such a thing exist? Negress breeders? I don’t think so. I think niggers had more dignity than the modern middle class white American.)

So now we have wrapped around to ‘why.’ Why this? I think like ARGs in general, one potential motivation is as a distraction. Yes, some damaging information was exposed or at least referenced by Q, as it is important to note that those posting under the Q trip code never actually leaked anything themselves. That in itself is revealing – references without dumps or leaks. Yet like above, these were almost all modified limited hangouts. If certain information is going to get out – like Epstein, “Pizzagate” (which I contend is a fucking stupid name), problems with the official narrative on 9/11, or various intelligence mishaps – it is best to step out and seed one’s own narratives. Intel agencies like doing this, giving out truth and bullshit in equal measure in general, and feeding to some largely delusion. Some portions of the ‘conspiracy’ community are intelligence assets whose purpose is to deliver these absolutely astoundingly retarded narratives, whether it be no planes 9/11 or JFK was shot by a Martian or Hitler living in Antarctica. It is actually true that one cannot contain the truth indefinitely, but one can throw up so many contradictory narratives that if you have 10 people in a room, they will believe 12 things and any uninformed onlookers will tune out or believe the official account out of convenience. The truth about the American government since the 1930s usually involves a lot more hooknoses than intel shills will admit openly.

A second major motivating factor is the “hopium” or “copium” angle. Getting people invested in Trump as an almost Messianic figure would have them not only passive and compliant, which is good as intel agencies foremost want a compliant populace to dick with, but it would have them surely voting for Trump. It turns out because of: dickery in swing states, probable fraud, and a drop in turnout in a key demographic of Trump voters (namely white men in swing states), these Q believing plan trusters didn’t matter much in the final analysis. They were not enough to seal the deal for Trump’s presidential bid, and despite the wailing and gnashing of teeth, Trump lacked the balls necessary to contest the election, commit to fraud himself, or even secure the election beforehand and so he handed the office to his successor whom his supporters view now as illegitimate. If the Demonrat narrative were true and the Communist takeover were right around the corner about to devastate the country, and the only thing standing in between that outcome and normalcy was Trump, would not anything be justified to achieve electoral victory? If your opponent was already known to cheat, and was furthermore believed to be almost demonic in their wicked behavior, evil, and maltreatment of the people broadly, would not anything be justified to achieve victory? The fact that Republicans generally and Trump specifically lie down belies that claim. As above, Republicans (and Trump) were born to lose.

A third potential motivating factor is the ‘white hat’ bit. It is supposed to get conservatives to believe that no matter how desperate or awful things seem, there is a faction of loyal conservatives in the government who are standing guard who won’t let things get too bad. This feeds in with the previous two bits, but it helps keep people invested in the government or at least not outright hating it. They suspect there is some faction of the White Army out there still fighting, or at least a sympathetic Red Army faction waiting to turn on the Communist Party cadre. It’s pure bullshit and anyone with a critical eye knows it. You are living in an occupation government run by people who hate you, who have no check on their behavior. Those who run this world could kill you and your whole family and nothing would come of it. Your name would likely be wiped off the record, and unless some intrepid journalist reports it truthfully you will likely be slandered or merely mentioned as having gone down in an untimely accident. This is the awful truth – things are bad, worse than they’ve ever been. It would have been easier to “do something” 20 years ago, or 40 years ago, but shit eating, glue huffing fucking retards kicked the can down the road and now we’re stuck with the bag.

A fourth potential motivating factor is that all of the Q memorabilia, events, sites, etc make people easy to track. Maybe you’re not the most high risk person, but as someone who is even questioning the conventional narrative and entertaining “conspiracy theories”, you are a potential threat and need to be watched to some capacity. Preferably, Q people should be cowed with gay ops – intelligence stings, entrapment schemes, and the like designed to periodically imprison or turn Q followers into informants and extend the eyes of the intelligence services. The sad fact is that conservatives, libertarians, and anarchists have no idea what it is like being a dissident. They have no idea how actual dissidents were treated in the USSR or other similar regimes. They also have no idea what tactics the intelligence-security agencies use to try to wrap up perceived problems for power.

I won’t use the derogatory term ‘Q-tard’ for people who were suckered by this psychological operation. Just the same, there were a large number of Trump supporters who were suckers for this shit and should realize that they were fools and try to fix their problem. Was the problem their raw gullibility, or the hopeful naiveté bordering on delusion? Hope is good, delusion can even be fine but not if one is deluding oneself off a cliff. Q is just short of that. These people were told to ‘trust the plan’ for 4 years despite repeated failures of predictions to manifest, or for various “plans” to be carried out. Anyone with a sober appraisal had suspicions 2 weeks after inauguration day in February 2017 and serious doubts 9 months later. By the end of 2018, I had given up all hope on Trump and concluded he was a Jew shill. As candidate Trump, I had what I thought were realistic expectations – that he would be a delaying action, a disappointment to a degree but achieve about one-third of his total campaign promises – but he disappointed even that.

Anyone who was onboard with Trump in 2015 and 2016, or worse bone and marrow conservatives (losers) who were with Romney in 2012 and initially went with Cruz in 2015 and ’16 until Trump won the primary – but who nonetheless stayed despite the total disappointment and memed a fake cult of personality into being needs to reckon with reality. You don’t need an orange father figure. Trump would fail you in that role as well. You need a society. Full-stop. You do not have one right now, you have the facsimile or simulation of one. Stop trusting the plan. Right now there is no plan that includes you (assuming you are white) or a future for your [white] children.

 

I will move on from Q specifically to intelligence agencies broadly. They are a relatively new phenomenon. They are viewed widely with some distrust, but certain narratives bleed out which are meant to inspire at least selective trust. I think that was the point of the ‘War on Terror’ and of the Bin Laden raid specifically. The Bin Laden raid served several purposes – a neat way to wrap up the ‘War on Terror’, a neat win for the Obama admin, and also a win for the intel agencies. Of course Osama Bin Laden was probably already dead at that point and had been dead for anywhere from 5 to 10 years. We don’t really know. They probably killed a relative of his or a body double. Most of the films of “Osama” which were paraded on American TV between 2001 and 2004 were not him, but an Arab who looked vaguely like him. The famous clip of him claiming responsibility for 9/11 was definitely not him, as there was a separate clip where he did an optics move and disavowed 9/11 which definitely was him. But this is something the American public did not know in 2001 or 2002, and does not widely know now, but those who do know are aware too late. The critical window passed.

9/11 itself was orchestrated by Israelis with cooperation from American intelligence. Many of those in “American intelligence” who helped the Israelis bring down the World Trade Centers were themselves dual citizens. For pieces of evidence, I submit: 1) WTC 7 collapsing in its own footprint like a classic controlled demo for no apparent reason; 2) molten metal gushing out of one of the towers clearly on camera about 15 minutes before its collapse; 3) ‘dancing Israelis’ – Mossad operatives, at least 4, who were staged starting the prior day on the New Jersey side of the city with cameras, and caught with explosives and demolitions gear as well as disguises and clearly knew the when & what; 4) recently released security footage from the Pentagon which shows it was probably struck with a missile but certainly not a 737 or 747 as alleged, a missile or other slender non-passenger jet projectile is clearly visible for 3 or 4 frames; 5) Muhammad Atta’s passport neatly discovered shortly after the collapse of one of the towers; 6) Larry Silverstein took out a massive insurance policy on the buildings only weeks prior; 7) Nearly all of the Israelis working at the towers were evacuated early, including those working at one company who were fucking paged over an hour before the attacks.

The only way one can dismiss those claims is the general conspiracy claim or with blanket incredulity and affirmation of the official story. On the other hand, the official story claims that invading Iraq and Afghanistan was logical despite nearly all of the highjackers hailing from Saudi Arabia and Egypt. The highjackers were known quantities and their plan was allowed to proceed apace, along with material support on the side from Israelis both within and without the US government. Any one of those claims above, if true, sheds some doubt on the official narrative. All of them together kill the motherfucker and necessitate something else to be true.

Most intel ops aren’t as big and flashy as the 9/11 op. With total media control, and the modern intelligence-security agencies have basically full control or at least cooperation from the media, there is a far greater breadth of latitude. Still, we have for instance color revolutions. The official US position is that these color revolutions are spontaneous, but the rest of the world knows that nearly all if not all of them are caused by agitation from a concert of CIA and State department assets in country along with American-based multinational corporations and media concerns. Countries are pressured after some weakness is sniffed out, and the pressure is ramped up continuously through economic, diplomatic, political, and covert means. Like with everything involving liberal plutocracy, this is dressed up as a great awakening of the people to overthrow some injustice and seek liberation, but it is usually anything but.

Anyone who looks at intelligence-security agencies could have nothing but distrust. If you are an oligarch, these agencies are good old friends. They have been loyal and done excellent service. As an everyman, they are terrifying tools – they represent thousands or tens of thousands of people, many of whom are compartmentalized and do not fully know what they are contributing to or why they do what they do. Like those in the military, they exhibit an essentially mercenary attitude or they are fundamentally delusional about the country they live in.

Intel agencies can create enemies out of whole cloth. They can paint a target on one’s back and gin up support in the wider society for one’s endless imprisonment or death. This is terrifying. 300 years ago, tyranny was not so easy to justify – generally a dissident could not so easily be tarred. Even the Marquis de Sade, whom the king had a good reason to throw in the Bastille, was ultimately viewed sympathetically by a large swathe of the public (maybe not the whole public, but still). In the present day, “white supremacy” is one slur that is used to paint a target on the backs of opponents of the system, real or perceived. Because of the successful demonization campaign of “white supremacy,” there is sufficient support for harsh treatment against such people that virtually anything can be done to one so labeled.

It isn’t anyone’s fault that they fall for intelligence ops individually. These operations can be very skilfully crafted. Sometimes they’re very convincing. Modified limited hangouts or other techniques are specifically created in such a way that they follow the Jewish formula of ‘two truths and a lie’ – you hook someone with two true statements and swindle them with a fat load of shit tacked on the end. Just the same, anyone with eyes to see eventually sees the cracks. If you have a good head and everything that goes with it, there comes a point where the veil that the intel op sets over your eyes starts to wear thin. Sometimes it wears thin quickly in a matter of weeks, other times it takes years to burn away. At that point, one has to reckon with the fact that they have been deceived and overcome this. If one stays overly invested, one builds excuses for the lie or expands the lie into delusion.

One thing people should ask themselves is why there are so many lies. Why are there so many things which have little (or not so little) fences drawn around them in ways that people feel compelled now to lie. Virtually everyone lies and often in not subtle and in very bothersome ways. I’ve been lied to personally about everything from jobs to future prospects to large parts of my childhood education. I’ve been told I “am free” and “able to do anything I set my mind to” when in fact I was destined for debt slavery unless I could connive my way into the managerial class. The power elite was obviously off limits because I wasn’t born into it. One could call these benign lies, but the first thing with slavery is to wake up to the reality of slavery. I wonder if the Soviet Union was mired in so many lies as we are, and I am compelled to think that actually Pravda (the newspaper) was probably more truthful than most American news and Soviet history books probably more truthful than most American history texts.

Lysenkoism is derided. Yet what is the claim that Jewish “holocaust survivors” and their children (and grandchildren!) suffer “intergenerational trauma”? Is that not but an updated form of Lysenkoism? The Jewish control mechanism is not to use religion, but to abolish it either quickly or slowly (the former being the Communist path, the latter being the Western ‘liberal’ path) and to replace it with other mechanisms of control which rely on lies and manipulation. The most insidious thing with the Western ‘liberal’ path is that the control scheme unfolds over several generations. The Communist path was more forceful, and generally imposed all of its schemes within one or at most two generations; the Western ‘liberal’ path is more subtle and unwound from basically 1900 to present.

This new Lysenkoism is a minor example. The Shoah or Holocaust narrative per se is a far bigger lie. The white guilt and white privilege narrative is a far bigger lie. White guilt and white privilege is largely projecting the narrow crimes of elites and Jews onto working and middle class whites Europeans who had little or nothing to do with the commission of these crimes. Per chance the allegation was even true, these “crimes” to the extent we entertain the notion would not even be exceptional in history. Arabs held more slaves throughout history, Jews were central to the West Eurasian and North African slave trade for over a thousand years, Jews were also unequivocally guilty at least in some cases of so-called “blood libel” acts which is to say ritual murder of gentile children (see: Blood Passover, A. Toaff for a Jewish source), and some of the alleged genocides caused by European empires are either exaggerated or did not happen. For instance: the Bengal famine is alleged by some as a genocide, but there seem now to have been British relief efforts but those relief efforts were insufficient to stop a few million Bengalis from starving to death. Similarly with the Belgian King Leopold and his Congolese colony: it seems not as many Congolese died as are alleged by modern authors, and many of those who did die in that period were often killed in tribal warfare or from disease. One cannot level claims of “genocide” at a European power on these grounds honestly.

Yet we see that the claims against most of the European powers exist to be stood up and repeated. That they might be hollow is beside the point, as those who crafted these narratives know that most students will not look into them any farther than a basic history course, and the demoralization effort will succeed. How does this tie into intel agencies? Counter intelligence and misinformation are two missions these agencies undertake. They target not only nominal enemy nations but the populace under occupation as well, which for the CIA for instance would be the American people and for MI6 would be the British people. These agencies have virtually all had their equivalent of the American CIA’s Operation Mockingbird. Mockingbird was an effort to put CIA liaisons, agents, and analysts at work at least part time in media and entertainment organizations. Their job was not only to produce PR that favored the intel agencies, but also to shill for whatever the agencies needed doing at the time. Even if one looks aside from Mockingbird, all of the major American broadcasting companies (ABC, CBS, NBC) and circulars like TIME-LIFE were founded in the 1940s and early ‘50s by people who were veterans of the state department, OSS, and wartime propaganda department. The lie with these broadcast companies, as with Silicon Valley 20-30 years later, was that these were purely “private” efforts when in fact they were public-private trusts from the start.

That’s not so great when you consider the fact that by 2015, all major mass communications were controlled by these corporations or parallel and spin-off efforts (these spin-offs include TIME-Warner or film studios like Universal which merged with TV corporations). Every major American city’s newspaper almost without exception was controlled by one of these corporations. Every local television station was and still is an affiliate of one of these monolithic corporations. While worrying, this is simply following the greater trend of centralization and consolidation that we have seen in the past 70-80 years conservatively. The Sherman Anti-Trust Act has done nothing to combat the size of these monolithic firms, indeed the number and scale of these firms has exploded since its passage which indicates that who is in charge, who interprets the law, and who is backstopping enforcement of the law matters a hell of a lot more than the wording or spirit of a law (if indeed that matters much at all). A good law can be ignored. A bad law can be zealously but arbitrarily enforced against the enemies of the powerful.

A fair amount of what I do is analyzing intel agencies. This is an interesting turn. Even five years ago, I did not believe GMO crops were unequivocally bad or petrochemicals were all that harmful. I’ve changed on that completely. I’ve also taken a sharper look at the intel agencies. I was always suspicious of them, but believed other things mattered more. It seems now that as I said prior, the actual three branches of government are finance, media, and intel-security. I’ve railed before against the civics course model of government, the conventional org chart and the “executive, legislative, judicial” layout they preach. It seems now that even the military is subservient to the three actual branches of government, as military units rely on intelligence to tell them who to fight and where, and they rely on finance and logistics for material support, and they rely on the media for legitimacy. If any one of those branches pulls its support the military – an ostensibly powerful arm of government – is powerless in the present arrangement and will be incapable of action. Perhaps that was the real reason generals refuse to station American soldiers on the Mexican border? If the media delegitimizes border policing actions by the military, the military will find itself under fire by citizens and politicians and demoralized as well as incapable of doing its job as prescribed by the nominal executive.

We have the QAnon psyop. We have media liaisons like Seymour Hirsch, Henry Luce, the Sulzburgers, Vicki Ward – basically everyone who is in charge of the public-private trusts mentioned or hinted above and several of the big journalists under them at places like the NY Times, Vanity Fair, or CNN. On CNN, they have “retired” CIA officials. Most of the wire agencies were founded by Jews or cosmopolitan gentiles working for merchant bankers (usually the Rothschilds or their cousins). Forsooth, who speaks plainly in our rotten age? If my contention is true – and it is – it would seem ‘no one’ is the sad fact – at least on the major television networks and newspapers.